cleaned up significance plots covered in a mountain of source names
made sure I understood fermi plots
met with Jooyun
gave presentation, there was feedback
high TS could be from something with lower energies? maybe (probably) not correct It is correct. More counts at lower energies make fitting easier/more confident so TS is higher
SED is very confident in comparison to published data, too confident
UNITS!!!! and ROUNDING!!!
Wednesday 6/21
attempted to figure out what was happening with my higher TS values and low SED uncertainty
met with Kaya and Luca, no Jooyun
crash course on dN/dE and integral energy flux
HW: find out relationship between CR E flux and gamma ray E flux
gave presentation at group meeting
UNITS! again
future discussion of main project
met with Kaya, Luca and Jooyun
LHAASO is all the rage
political physics, making deals with the russians
met with Jooyun
explained high TS and low uncertainty
more counts at lower E so more confident
less time used in other studies so more uncertainty
bin large/use catalogue binning because less counts per bin is meaningless. There is so much uncertainty that it's useless
Thursday 6/22
started program to calculated integrated energy flux. First python program, let's go!!!!
met with Reshmi
make butterfly graph(?) of the power law over energy range of telescope
next source unclear
Friday 6/23
finished program to calculate integrated energy flux
fixed count density using modified program
met with Reshmi and Ruo
new advice: more practice with Crab and non-UHE LHAASO source
met with Jooyun
disagreed with new source directions
went over code for fermi analysis
Week of 6/26/23
Monday 6/26
went through fermi code and examples from Fermi Summer School to understand and prepare for writing advanced analysis code